When my
son was three and a half, he asked for a flying carpet for Christmas.
This
caused an immediate panic in our household.
He insisted, despite all evidence to the contrary, that flying carpets
existed and Santa would have no problem procuring one. After all, Santa was magic.
We
debated a plan of action for the next little while. Distraction didn't seem to work; all efforts
to show him other better, more attractive toys failed. Logic, as a strategy, was completely out the
window; three-year-olds are not known for their critical reasoning skills. All we could do, we figured, was to purchase
a carpet that looked like a flying carpet and hope for the best.
On
Christmas Day, we had a very happy little boy.
He dragged the coffee table in front of the television set, put his
little area rug on top of it, and watched Aladdin
repeatedly while "flying" his carpet.
After a
while, though, he tired of pretending.
This wasn't a flying carpet, he realized. In terms of flying carpets, his was a dud.
The Task
Force for Teaching Excellence report is much the same as my son's flying
carpet. It promises a magical ride full of wonder and joy for many teachers, as it makes recommendations for increased
mentorship, preparation time, and professional development. Those fantastical promises are the stuff of
which teachers' dreams are made. Just
imagine a world in which a teacher had a prep period every day! Or professional development that was
self-directed, job-embedded, and fully funded!
This, indeed, would make Alberta a teaching Shangri-La. I'm worried, though, that the recommendations
that are most attractive to teachers are not fiscally feasible, thereby
grounding the promised flight before it even has a chance to fly.
Minister
Johnson, in his most recent email to teachers, said, "The [Task Force for
Teaching Excellence] report makes many recommendations that, if implemented,
would empower and support teachers throughout their careers. For instance, the Task Force calls for
increased time for preparation, a mentorship program for younger teachers, a
more formal set of best practices, and increased access to technology and
professional support." Most of this
sounds great. Please, though, consider
our provincial context before buying into the infomercial.
Currently,
education funding in Alberta is largely a shell game. For instance, during the last budget, Alberta
Education proudly announced that funding for English Language Learners was
increasing. Well, the per-year
allocation increased ever-so-slightly, but funding was cut back from seven
years of support to five. This means
that overall support for English Language Learners was actually cut, not
increased.
We have
to ensure that any increase to teacher preparation time or professional
development is not given the same treatment.
Stick with me while we do a little math:
For
years, I taught in Junior High on a six day rotation. There were seven classes a day. According to my contract, I had to teach 1430
minutes per week (this was my time in front of students, not my entire work day). This meant I had two forty-five minute
"prep" periods every six days.
Given the information we know about teacher workload, it wouldn't be an
unreasonable to wish for a prep every day.
This would allow me to return assessments in a more timely fashion, open
up possibilities for collaborative work with other colleagues, allow me to set
up interesting and new lesson plans, or provide time for some professional
learning.
In order
to have a prep period every day, I would need four more prep periods. This amount of time, because time is money,
would cost the school $10 000 (roughly, but we are just doing rough estimates,
here. This is a fairly accurate
number). If there were 10,000 junior
high teachers in the province (I have no idea, actually, but play along with me. We have 36,000 teachers overall, so let's
just go with ten thousand for easy math) and that prep time cost $10 000 each,
then adding additional prep time to teachers' schedules would cost the province
$100 000 000.
That's
right. One hundred million dollars. For
only a third of the teaching population.
Somehow,
I don't see that in our future.
But it is
possible that money will be shifted around.
In order to provide prep time for teachers, the money could be taken
from other areas. This would satisfy the
TF recommendation, but still have the overall effect of reducing student and
teacher supports. This is how the shell
game works.
Call me a
cynic.
While I'm
being cynical, it has not escaped my notice that the recommendations that are problematic to the ATA, like removing principals from the Association or having
teachers become re-certified every five years, do not have a hefty price tag
associated with them. For instance, much
of the re-certification paperwork could be downloaded to principals (who already
have a significant workload issue).
Actually, I would anticipate that any costs associated with
re-certification would be on a cost-recovery model, a situation that would see
teachers having to pay a fee to be re-certified. That's just speculation, but it is within the
realm of possibility. Certainly more
possible than "increased time for preparation."
In order
to make sure that this Task Force does not take us on a trippy magic carpet
ride that ultimately crashes and burns, teachers need to take action. At the very least, it certainly appears to me
that the recommendations that would support teachers are unlikely to get off
the ground without a significant influx of money. If these recommendations are truly important
to teacher excellence, then we need to lobby for increased, sustainable, and
predictable funding.
We are
left with few options but to let our voices be heard. Minister Johnson and I agree on this:
Teachers need to respond to the Task Force survey. Please go to www.education.alberta.ca/TeachingExcellence to complete the survey by
June 15. (I know. This is the worst possible time of year to
ask teachers to complete anything but report cards. But this is important. Make time, as best you can.) It is only by speaking out that we can help
shape the future of education in this province.
Right on!
ReplyDelete